Thinking and Reasoning 14 (4):365-394 (2008)

Authors
Susan Butler
High Point University
Abstract
The “exchange paradox”—also referred to in the literature by a variety of other names, notably the “two-envelopes problem”—is notoriously difficult, and experts are not all agreed as to its resolution. Some of the various expressions of the problem are open to more than one interpretation; some are stated in such a way that assumptions are required in order to fill in missing information that is essential to any resolution. In three experiments several versions of the problem were used, in each of which the information given was sufficient to determine an optimal choice strategy when it exists or to justify indifference regarding keeping or trading when such a strategy does not exist. College students who were presented with the various versions of the problem tended to base their choices on simple heuristics and to give little evidence of understanding the probabilistic implications of the differences in the problem statements
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2008
DOI 10.1080/13546780802253675
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Probabilistic Reasoning in the Two-Envelope Problem.Bruce D. Burns - 2015 - Thinking and Reasoning 21 (3):295-316.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Opening Two Envelopes.Paul Syverson - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (4):479-498.
Rationality and Epistemic Paradox.Frederick Kroon - 1993 - Synthese 94 (3):377 - 408.
How Braess' Paradox Solves Newcomb's Problem: Not!Louis Marinoff - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):217 – 237.
A Resolution of Bertrand's Paradox.Louis Marinoff - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):1-24.
How Braess' Paradox Solves Newcomb's Problem.A. D. Irvine - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):141 – 160.
The Mathematics of Skolem's Paradox.Timothy Bays - 2006 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. North Holland. pp. 615--648.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
66 ( #166,394 of 2,462,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,428 of 2,462,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes