Multiple Communities and Controlling Corruption

Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):805 - 813 (2009)

Abstract
Corruption presents an assurance problem to businesses: all businesses are best off if none act corruptly but in the event that corruption occurs are better off if they act corruptly than if they do not, and because there is no assurance that other actors are not cheating a business does not know how to act. The usual solution to an assurance problem – criminal sanctions imposed on cheaters – does not work in a corrupt system. Integrative Social Contract Theory suggests a solution to the assurance problem. Application of Integrative Social Contract Theory to corruption demonstrates that in the case of corruption it has advantages over international law, and that the theory's elegance lies in its recognition of norms generated by multiple communities
Keywords corruption  Integrative Social Contract Theory  international law  microsocial contracts
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10551-009-0320-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,668
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Integrative Social Contracts Theory.Thomas Donaldson & Thomas Dunfee - 1994 - Economics and Philosophy 10 (2):85-112.
Catalyzing Corporate Commitment to Combating Corruption.David Hess - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):781 - 790.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-26

Total views
27 ( #306,458 of 2,250,069 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #86,137 of 2,250,069 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature