Process Debunking and Ethics

Ethics 124 (4):727-749 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this essay, two different forms of debunking arguments are distinguished. On the type of debunking argument that I will promote, one attempts to undercut the justificatory status of a belief by showing that the belief was formed by an epistemically defective psychological process. I argue that there is a promising application of such a process debunking argument in metaethics. In normative ethics, however, process debunking arguments face greater obstacles



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Guy Kahane - 2010 - Noûs 45 (1):103-125.
Debunking Evolutionary Debunking.Katia Vavova - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 9:76-101.
Nativism and the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.Brendan Cline - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2):231-253.
When psychology undermines beliefs.Derek Leben - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology (3):1-23.
Evolutionary debunking arguments against theism, reconsidered.Jonathan Jong & Aku Visala - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (3):243-258.
Evolution and Impartiality.Guy Kahane - 2014 - Ethics 124 (2):327-341.


Added to PP

175 (#111,762)

6 months
13 (#197,285)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Shaun Nichols
Cornell University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references