Why Do Mirrors Reverse Left/Right and Not up/down?

Philosophy 69 (268):205 - 210 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imagine a child′s toy arrow, sticking by its rubber sucker to a mirror′s reflective surface. We can call the direction in which such an arrow would point the finwards direction ; and we can call the opposite direction boutwards . When we look at things in a mirror, their images are apparently just as far finwards of the mirror as the things themselves are boutwards of it. For example, if we look at the tail of our arrow and cast our glance finwards, we see first the tail, then the head, then the mirror, then the reflection of the head, and finally the reflection of the tail. We can therefore say that a mirror reverses things in the finwards/boutwards dimension. Moreover, the straight line connecting each thing to its image passes perpendicularly through the plane of the mirror. Hence there is no plane, apart from that of the mirror itself, such that the apparent location of each thing′s image is just as far to the one side of that plane as the original is to the other. This means that the reversal in the finwards/ boutwards dimension is the only reversal of its kind to take place. In particular, there is no such reversal in any dimension at right angles to finwards/boutwards

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
85 (#194,339)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Denyer
Trinity College

Citations of this work

Dimensions: A New Ontology of Properties.Xi-Yang Guo - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Durham

Add more citations

References found in this work

Right, left, and the fourth dimension.James Van Cleve - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (1):33-68.

Add more references