Emotion Review 2 (4):340-347 (2010)

Zajonc and Markus published a chapter in 1984 that proposed solutions to the difficult problem of modeling interactions between cognition and emotion. The most radical of their proposals was the importance of the motor system in information processing. These initial preoccupations, when wedded with the vascular theory of emotional efference (VTEE), propelled theory and research about how the face works to control emotion and to control interpersonal interaction. We discuss the development of Bob’s thinking about facial expression—facial efference is the term he preferred—as he moved toward predictions that sounded radical at the time, and which these days sound like precursors to advances in neuroscience and psychology subsumed under the term “embodied cognition.”
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073910376423
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Imagery Debate: Analog Media Vs. Tacit Knowledge.Zenon W. Pylyshyn - 1981 - Psychological Review 88 (December):16-45.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Still Face, Moving Face.Jenny Edkins - 2013 - Journal for Cultural Research 17 (4):414-429.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
134 ( #82,132 of 2,461,463 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,382 of 2,461,463 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes