Conceptual Relativism

Grazer Philosophische Studien 3 (1):71-87 (1977)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptual relativism is characterized and elucitated in such a way that its force can be appreciated. It is argued that the usual attempts to dismiss it as a conceptual confusion fail. Then two attempts to articulate a conception of rationality adequate to show how conceptual relativism rests on a mistake are examined and shown to be at the best only partially successful. The upshot is, that, counter-intuitive as it is, the problem of conceptual relativism is still very much with us.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual relativism.Anthony Brueckner - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):295–301.
Non-dualism versus Conceptual Relativism.P. Kügler - 2013 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (2):247-252.
Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):182-190.
On Davidson's refutation of conceptual schemes and conceptual relativism.Xinli Wang - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):140-164.
Meiland and the Self-Refutation of Protagorean Relativism.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 23 (1):119-128.
How must relativism be construed to be coherent?John F. Fox - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (1):55-75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
31 (#503,056)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references