Inquiry 25 (3):277 – 306 (1982)
A method of reflective equilibrium is adumbrated and then used to test the adequacy of moral conceptions appealing to fundamental human rights against Nietzschean conceptions of morality which would reject such an appeal. There is an attempt here both to articulate and critically probe a distinctive moral methodology (the method of reflective equilibrium) and to examine skeptical challenges to a foundationalism which would ground morality in fundamental rights claims. I attempt a partial testing of such a moral methodology by examining its ability to meet such skeptical challenges to the rational grounding of human rights, and I assess (and this is plainly a reciprocal process) the depth of such skeptical challenges by the ability of such challenges to survive such an application of a method of reflective equilibrium. If that method is applied with discrimination and understanding, is it sufficient to defuse skeptical challenges to the pervasive belief that either rationality or the very taking of the moral point of view requires the acceptance of the belief that the design of morally acceptable social institutions and practices must be such that they aim at achieving a state of affairs in which all human beings are to be afforded equal consideration? Can a method of reflective equilibrium establish that a good society must embody such a commitment to an equality of human rights?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.Norman Daniels - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (5):256-282.
Jenseits von Gut Und Böse . Die Geburt der Tragödie.Friedrich Nietzsche - 2014 - Felix Meiner Verlag.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough?Thomas Kelly & Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):325-359.
Ethics and Intuitions: A Reply to Singer. [REVIEW]Joakim Sandberg & Niklas Juth - 2011 - Journal of Ethics 15 (3):209-226.
The Method of Reflective Equilibrium: Wide, Radical, Fallible, Plausible.Carl Knight - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):205-229.
The Amoralist Objection and the Method of Moral Reasoning.Matej Sušnik - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):91-100.
The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium.Jared Bates - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):347–356.
Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think About Morality.Ben Eggleston - 2010 - Mind 119 (475):549-584.
Reflective Equilibrium and Methodology of Science.Elvio Baccarini - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):175 – 180.
Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics.Carson Strong - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):123-140.
Added to index2009-01-30
Total downloads30 ( #164,256 of 2,146,811 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,529 of 2,146,811 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.