BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):17 (2015)

Conscientious objection to participating in induced abortion is not present in the Finnish health care system or legislation unlike in many other European countries
Keywords Conscientious objection  Induced abortion  Reproductive health  Survey
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/s12910-015-0012-1
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,814
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conscientious Objection in Italy: Table 1.Francesca Minerva - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (2):170-173.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Public Cartels, Private Conscience.Michael Cholbi - 2018 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 17 (4):356-377.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Victorian Abortion Law Reform Bill 2008.Marcia Riordan - 2008 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (2):7.
Improving Abortion Access in Canada.Chris Kaposy - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (1):17-34.
When Should Conscientious Objection Be Accepted.Morten Magelssen - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):18-21.
Abortion and Conscientious Objection.Daniel J. Hill - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):344-350.


Added to PP index

Total views
55 ( #185,393 of 58,779 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,834 of 58,779 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes