Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):994-995 (2001)

Abstract
Sensorimotor contingencies are certainly of great importance for perception but they are no substitute for the internal representation of perceived information. I argue that internal, non-iconic representations of perceptions must, and do, exist and that sensorimotor contingencies are an integral part of them. Further, I argue that mastery of the sensory apparatus or environment is not a prerequisite for perception and that perception is possible in the absence of any control over the perceptual process.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x01460110
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,348
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
42 ( #243,452 of 2,420,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,912 of 2,420,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes