Survey article. Verisimilitude: the third period

Abstract
The modern history of verisimilitude can be divided into three periods. The first began in 1960, when Karl Popper proposed his qualitative definition of what it is for one theory to be more truthlike than another theory, and lasted until 1974, when David Miller and Pavel Trichý published their refutation of Popper's definition. The second period started immediately with the attempt to explicate truthlikeness by means of relations of similarity or resemblance between states of affairs (or their linguistic representations); the work within this similarity approach was summarized in the books of Graham Oddie [1986] and Ilkka Niiniluoto [1987]. During the subsequent third period, studies in verisimilitude have been actively continued, and interesting results and applications have been achieved, but not many dramatic novelties. While it is now obsolete to claim that truthlikeness with reasonable properties cannot be defined at all, there is still a lot of controversy about the best and least arbitrary approach to doing this
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/49.1.1
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 25,651
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Truth Approximation Via Abductive Belief Change.Gustavo Cevolani - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (6):999-1016.
Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.JesÚ Zamora Bonilla & P. S. - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
Predictive Accuracy as an Achievable Goal of Science.Malcolm R. Forster - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S124-S134.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Verisimilitude: Views and Reviews.Chris Brink - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):181-201.
Verisimilitude: The Third Period.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29.
Strongly Semantic Information and Verisimilitude.Gustavo Cevolani - 2011 - Etica and Politica / Ethics and Politics (2):159-179.
What Shall We Do with Verisimilitude?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (2):181-197.
On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude.Pavel Tichy - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):155-160.
Verisimilitude Versus Probable Verisimilitude.Keith E. Jones - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):174-176.
What is Wrong with Verisimilitude.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:511-541.
Decision-Theoretic Epistemology.Ruth Weintraub - 1990 - Synthese 83 (1):159 - 177.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

138 ( #32,276 of 2,143,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #280,273 of 2,143,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums