British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29 (1998)
The modern history of verisimilitude can be divided into three periods. The first began in 1960, when Karl Popper proposed his qualitative definition of what it is for one theory to be more truthlike than another theory, and lasted until 1974, when David Miller and Pavel Trichý published their refutation of Popper's definition. The second period started immediately with the attempt to explicate truthlikeness by means of relations of similarity or resemblance between states of affairs (or their linguistic representations); the work within this similarity approach was summarized in the books of Graham Oddie  and Ilkka Niiniluoto . During the subsequent third period, studies in verisimilitude have been actively continued, and interesting results and applications have been achieved, but not many dramatic novelties. While it is now obsolete to claim that truthlikeness with reasonable properties cannot be defined at all, there is still a lot of controversy about the best and least arbitrary approach to doing this
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Truth Approximation Via Abductive Belief Change.Gustavo Cevolani - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (6):999-1016.
Verisimilitude, Cross Classification and Prediction Logic. Approaching the Statistical Truth by Falsified Qualitative Theories.Roberto Festa - 2007 - Mind and Society 6 (1):91-114.
Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.JesÚ Zamora Bonilla & P. S. - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
Predictive Accuracy as an Achievable Goal of Science.Malcolm R. Forster - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S124-S134.
Similar books and articles
Verisimilitude: Views and Reviews.Chris Brink - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (2):181-201.
Verisimilitude: The Third Period.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):1-29.
Strongly Semantic Information and Verisimilitude.Gustavo Cevolani - 2011 - Etica and Politica / Ethics and Politics (2):159-179.
What Shall We Do with Verisimilitude?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (2):181-197.
On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude.Pavel Tichy - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):155-160.
Verisimilitude and Belief Revision. With a Focus on the Relevant Element Account.Gerhard Schurz - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (2):203-221.
Truthlikeness, Rationality and Scientific Method.Bonilla Jesus P. Zamora - 2000 - Synthese 122 (3):321-335.
From Survey to Ecology: The Role of the British Vegetation Committee, 1904-1913. [REVIEW]Kaat Schulte Fischedick - 2000 - Journal of the History of Biology 33 (2):291 - 314.
Verisimilitude Versus Probable Verisimilitude.Keith E. Jones - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):174-176.
What is Wrong with Verisimilitude.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:511-541.
Belief Revision and Verisimilitude Based on Preference and Truth Orderings.Gerard Renardel de Lavalette & Sjoerd Zwart - 2011 - Erkenntnis 75 (2):237-254.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads138 ( #32,276 of 2,143,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,273 of 2,143,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.