Philosophical Studies 119 (3):315-342 (2004)

There are researchers in cognitive science who use clinical and experimental evidence to draw some rather skeptical conclusions about a central feature of our conscious experience, its unity. They maintain that the examination of clinical phenomena reveals that human consciousness has a much more fragmentary character than the one we normally attribute to it. In the article, these claims are questioned by examining some of the clinical studies on the deficit of anosognosia. I try to show that these studies support a moderate sense of the unity of reflexive consciousness
Keywords Consciousness  Metaphysics  Normativity  Reflection  Unity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/B:PHIL.0000030435.87499.d4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,768
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warrant and Proper Function.Alvin Plantinga - 1993 - Oxford University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Unities of Consciousness.Elizabeth Schechter - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):197-218.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
114 ( #97,319 of 2,462,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #223,431 of 2,462,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes