Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):259-282 (2012)
Recent work such as Steven Levitt's Freakonomics has prompted economic methodologists to reevaluate the state of relations between economics and its neighboring disciplines. Although this emerging literature on ?economics imperialism? has its merits, the positions advanced within it have been remarkably divergent: some have argued that economics imperialism is a fiction; others that it is a fact attributable to the triumph of neoclassical economics; and yet others that the era of economics imperialism is over. We believe the confusion results in part from a lack of historical understanding about the nature and aims of economics imperialists. We seek to improve historical understanding by focusing on the activities of a cadre of economists at the epicenter of economics imperialism, the University of Chicago. These activities ? led, in the first instance, by Aaron Director and, in the second, by George Stigler ? stemmed from the effort to forge a new liberalism or a ?neoliberalism.? We then consider Steven Levitt's Freakonomics in light of the insights gained from our historical study. Our analysis leads us to question each of the three positions on economics imperialism held by economic methodologists
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Economics Imperialism: Concept and Constraints.Uskali Mäki - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3):351-380.
The Booming Economics-Made-Fun Genre: More Than Having Fun, but Less Than Economics Imperialism.Jack J. Vromen - 2009 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):70-99.
Citations of this work BETA
Economics Imperialism and the Role of Educational Philosophy.Tal Gilead - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (7):715-733.
Similar books and articles
On the Philosophy of the New Kiosk Economics of Everything.Uskali Mäki - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (3):219-230.
Situational Analysis Beyond Neoclassical Economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Economics Imperialism and Solution Concepts in Political Science.J. Kuorikoski & A. Lehtinen - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (3):347-374.
Teaching Economic Philosophy: Economics, Ethics and the Search for the Right Maximand.L. A. Duhs - unknown -
Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 2: Explanatory Ecumenism and Economics Imperialism.Uskali Mäki - 2002 - Economics and Philosophy 18 (2):235-257.
Economics Made Fun, and Made Fun Of: How 'Fun' Redefines the Domain and Identity of the Economics Profession.Erwin Dekker & Paul Teule - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4):427-437.
Applied Economics and the Critical Realist Critique.Paul Downward (ed.) - 2003 - Routledge.
Models of Man: Neoclassical, Behavioural, and Evolutionary.Dennis C. Mueller - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):59-76.
Imperialism Old and New: A Comment on David Harvey's The New Imperialism and Ellen Meiksins Wood's Empire of Capital.Bob Sutcliffe - 2006 - Historical Materialism 14 (4):59-78.
Beyond the Positive–Normative Dichotomy: Some Remarks on Colander'sLost Art of Economics.Huei-Chun Su - 2012 - Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (4):375-390.
Added to index2012-10-03
Total downloads9 ( #443,761 of 2,065,369 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #295,918 of 2,065,369 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.