Towards Diffractive Transdisciplinarity: Integrating Gender Knowledge into the Practice of Neuroscientific Research
Neuroethics 5 (3):231-245 (2012)
The current neurosciences contribute to the construction of gender/sex to a high degree. Moreover, the subject of gender/sex differences in cognitive abilities attracts an immense public interest. At the same time, the entanglement of gender and science has been shown in many theoretical and empirical analyses. Although the body of literature is very extensive and differentiated with regards to the dimensions of ‘neuroscience of gender’ and ‘gender in neuroscience’, the feeding back of these findings into the field of neuroscience remains a desideratum. Especially, the question of how gender knowledge, i.e. insights from feminist theory on gender/sex and from gender and science studies on knowledge production, may be integrated and applied within the neurosciences has been strongly neglected. Presumably due to their epistemic culture and epistemological presuppositions, these critical engagements are conceived as externalist by critical scholars and neuroscientists alike. In this context, the question arises of how substantiated gender knowledge may be accounted for in neuroscientific research practice? The article outlines methodological considerations for a critical research agenda in the cognitive neurosciences. I present thoughts on how insights and expertise from gender and science studies can be taken into account in the neuroscientific practice of knowledge production. Starting from the assumption that changes in neuroscientific research practices are possible, my aim is to point out possibilities of integrating gender knowledge into the neurosciences
|Keywords||Neuroscience Knowledge production Gender/sex Feminist theory Diffractive methodology Neuroethics Research practice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.Judith Butler - 1990 - Routledge.
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning.Karen Michelle Barad - 2007 - Duke University Press.
Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge.K. Knorr-Cetina - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality.Anne Fausto-Sterling & Edward Stein - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (3):203-208.
Citations of this work BETA
Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.des FitzgeraldCallard Felicity - 2015 - Theory, Culture and Society 32 (1):3-32.
Similar books and articles
Neuroethics, Gender and the Response to Difference.Deboleena Roy - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):217-230.
Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable.Beverley Skeggs - 1997 - Sage Publications.
Hardwired for Sexism? Approaches to Sex/Gender in Neuroscience.Rebecca Jordan-Young & Raffaella I. Rumiati - 2012 - Neuroethics 5 (3):305-315.
New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing.Robyn Bluhm - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
Philosophy and Gender: Critical Concepts in Philosophy.Cressida J. Heyes (ed.) - 2012 - Routledge.
Gender/Body/Knowledge: Feminist Reconstructions of Being and Knowing.Alison M. Jaggar & Susan Bordo (eds.) - 1989 - Rutgers University Press.
Rethinking Gender Politics in Laboratories and Neuroscience Research: The Case of Spatial Abilities in Math Performance.Emily Ngubia Kuria & Volker Hess - 2011 - Medicine Studies 3 (2):117-123.
Challenging Situatedness: Gender, Culture and the Production of Knowledge.Ericka Engelstad & Siri Gerrard (eds.) - 2005 - Eburon.
The Role of Gender in Practice Knowledge: Claiming Half the Human Experience.Josefina Figueira-McDonough, Ann Nichols-Casebolt & F. Ellen Netting (eds.) - 1998 - Garland.
Added to index2011-09-26
Total downloads31 ( #167,561 of 2,178,181 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,181 )
How can I increase my downloads?