Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):1-15 (2017)

Authors
Nils-Frederic Wagner
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Abstract
In this article we critically review the neural mechanisms of moral cognition that have recently been studied via electroencephalography (EEG). Such studies promise to shed new light on traditional moral questions by helping us to understand how effective moral cognition is embodied in the brain. It has been argued that conflicting normative ethical theories require different cognitive features and can, accordingly, in a broadly conceived naturalistic attempt, be associated with different brain processes that are rooted in different brain networks and regions. This potentially morally relevant brain activity has been empirically investigated through EEG-based studies on moral cognition. From neuroscientific evidence gathered in these studies, a variety of normative conclusions have been drawn and bioethical applications have been suggested. We discuss methodological and theoretical merits and demerits of the attempt to use EEG techniques in a morally significant way, point to legal challenges and policy implications, indicate the potential to reveal biomarkers of psychopathological conditions, and consider issues that might inform future bioethical work.
Keywords Electroencephalography (EEG)  Brain Imaging  Moral cognition  Biomarkers
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11673-017-9780-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century.Neil Levy - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Sex, Drugs, and a Few Other Things.Michael Ashby - 2017 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 14 (2):163-165.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Cognition.Axel Cleeremans - 2001 - International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Practical Cognition, Intuition, and the Fact of Reason.Patrick Kain - 2010 - In Benjamin Lipscomb & James Krueger (eds.), Kant's Moral Metaphysics: God, Freedom, and Immortality. de Gruyter. pp. 211--230.
On the Problem of Moral Evaluation.Maria Makai - 1976 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 15 (3):89-101.
Particularism, Analogy, and Moral Cognition.Marcello Guarini - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (3):385-422.
Moral Nativism: A Sceptical Response.Kim Sterelny - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (3):279-297.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-28

Total views
19 ( #585,017 of 2,519,575 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,332 of 2,519,575 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes