Ecological Refugees, States Borders, and the Lockean Proviso

Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):359-375 (2010)

Authors
Cara Nine
University College, Cork
Abstract
Ecological refugees are expected to make up an increasing percentage of overall refugees in the coming decades as predicted climate change related disasters will displace millions of people. In this essay, I focus on those rights ecological refugees may claim on the basis of collective self-determination. To this end, I will focus on a few specific cases that I call cases of ‘ecological refugee states’. Tuvalu, the Maldives, and to a certain extent, Bangladesh are predicted to be ecological refugee states in the near future. These are states whose entire (or close to it) geographical territory is predicted to be lost to rising sea levels; the collective body of the people will itself become an ecological refugee.The question is: what may the people of an ecological refugee state legitimately claim on the basis of their right to self-determination? Should we redraw state borders to accommodate a New Tuvalu? I argue that a plausible position regarding territorial rights is that when (1) a people clearly is (or recently was) self-determining and has a legitimate claim to continue to be self-determining, and (2) the self-determination of a people is existentially threatened because the people lacks territorial rights, that (3) the people becomes a candidate for sovereign over a new territory. The result is that existing state borders may need to change to accommodate something like a New Tuvalu. To generate these results on behalf of ecological refugee states, I examine the principles of the system of territorial states. Because the system of territorial states is a system of exclusive rights over goods, especially land, it is possible that it is subject to the conditions of a Lockean proviso mechanism. This paper is dedicated mainly to adapting a version of the Lockean proviso for use in territorial rights theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00498.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,395
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights.Lea Ypi - 2014 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):288-312.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Floating Provisos and Sinking Islands.Avery Kolers - 2012 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):333-343.
A Liberal Theory of Asylum.Andy Lamey - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):235-257.
Who Are Refugees?Matthew Lister* - 2013 - Law and Philosophy 32 (5):645-671.
Toward a Reformulation of International Refugee Law.Jack I. Garvey - 1985 - Harvard International Law Journal 26 (2):483-500.
Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso.Tibor R. Machan - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Modeling of Ecologic Policy of the States of the Central Asia.Mamashakirov Saidmurad - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:131-137.
What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants?Sune Lægaard - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):245-262.
The Lockean Enough-and-as-Good Proviso: An Internal Critique.Helga Varden - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (3):410-442.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-26

Total views
143 ( #58,650 of 2,291,347 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #98,567 of 2,291,347 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature