Ecological Refugees, States Borders, and the Lockean Proviso

Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):359-375 (2010)
Ecological refugees are expected to make up an increasing percentage of overall refugees in the coming decades as predicted climate change related disasters will displace millions of people. In this essay, I focus on those rights ecological refugees may claim on the basis of collective self-determination. To this end, I will focus on a few specific cases that I call cases of ‘ecological refugee states’. Tuvalu, the Maldives, and to a certain extent, Bangladesh are predicted to be ecological refugee states in the near future. These are states whose entire (or close to it) geographical territory is predicted to be lost to rising sea levels; the collective body of the people will itself become an ecological refugee.The question is: what may the people of an ecological refugee state legitimately claim on the basis of their right to self-determination? Should we redraw state borders to accommodate a New Tuvalu? I argue that a plausible position regarding territorial rights is that when (1) a people clearly is (or recently was) self-determining and has a legitimate claim to continue to be self-determining, and (2) the self-determination of a people is existentially threatened because the people lacks territorial rights, that (3) the people becomes a candidate for sovereign over a new territory. The result is that existing state borders may need to change to accommodate something like a New Tuvalu. To generate these results on behalf of ecological refugee states, I examine the principles of the system of territorial states. Because the system of territorial states is a system of exclusive rights over goods, especially land, it is possible that it is subject to the conditions of a Lockean proviso mechanism. This paper is dedicated mainly to adapting a version of the Lockean proviso for use in territorial rights theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00498.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,411
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lea Ypi (2014). A Permissive Theory of Territorial Rights. European Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):288-312.
Avery Kolers (2012). Attachment to Territory: Status or Achievement? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):101-123.
Lea Ypi (2013). Territorial Rights and Exclusion. Philosophy Compass 8 (3):241-253.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Avery Kolers (2012). Floating Provisos and Sinking Islands. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):333-343.
Andy Lamey (2012). A Liberal Theory of Asylum. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):235-257.
Matthew Lister (2013). Who Are Refugees? Law and Philosophy 32 (5):645-671.
Jack I. Garvey (1985). Toward a Reformulation of International Refugee Law. Harvard International Law Journal 26 (2):483-500.
Tibor R. Machan (2009). Self-Ownership and the Lockean Proviso. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (1):93-98.
Mamashakirov Saidmurad (2008). Modeling of Ecologic Policy of the States of the Central Asia. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:131-137.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

94 ( #50,577 of 1,924,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #211,945 of 1,924,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.