Responsibility and responsiveness. Reflections on the communicative dimension of responsibility

Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 53 (1):90-108 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The debate on the role and identity of Christian social ethics in liberal democracy touches upon the question about the relationship between universality and specificity. Rather than argue for the difference between these approaches, it can be argued that they are to be understood in a differentiated unity with each other. This idea can be substantiated by a figurative appropriation of a Chalcedonian Christology, particularly the communicatio idiomatum . The communicative dimension of this concept has been found to be useful for a reinterpretation of the idea of responsibility. By engaging contemporary positions of communicative ethics, H. Richard Niebuhr's understanding of responsibility as responsiveness, and Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Christological concept of responsibility in a constructive dialogue with each other, the article has attempted to outline main tenets of a responsive concept of responsibility based on a broadly conceived Chalcedonian Christology. This responsive understanding of responsibility serves as the foundation of a third position beyond the futile antagonism of liberalism and communitarianism. Hereby it maintains the reasonableness of a liberal democratic assertion of a common political discourse, and yet it also contends the necessity of authentic particular worldviews and outlooks. In its argument for such a third-way thinking it hopes to contribute with an understanding where these positions are seen in a constructive relationship – rather than in contrast – with each other

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship.Céline Kermisch - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
Values, ethics and personal responsibility.Joan McGregor & Jack Crittenden (eds.) - 2000 - [Phoenix, Ariz.: Arizona Town Hall.
Responsibility and obligation: Some Kantian directions.Suzanne M. Uniacke - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
Co-responsibility for research integrity.Carl Mitcham - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):273-290.
Informatics and professional responsibility.Donald Gotterbarn - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):221-230.
Local Loyalty-Universal Responsibility.Jan Hartman - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:73-78.
The real challenge to free will and responsibility.Maureen Sie & Arno Wouters - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):3-4.
Responsibility.John Randolph Lucas - 1995 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.
Arendt and Nietzsche on responsibility and futurity.Rosalyn Diprose - 2008 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (6):617-642.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-03-13

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references