Woodfield's analysis of teleology

Philosophy of Science 51 (3):488-494 (1984)
Abstract
Woodfield's analysis of teleology, though it has many virtues, nevertheless exhibits defects that are by no means peripheral. The acknowledged unity of teleological statements is removed because of the unnoticed difference between something being good and something appearing good. It is removed again because "good" does not have one meaning throughout but means desired in purposive and artifact-function TDs and beneficial in behavioral function and biological function TDs. In addition, the analyses of purposive and artifact-function TDs incorrectly claim that all goals are desired. Further, if "desired" is substituted for "good," those same analyses become incoherent. Finally, the interpretation of "belief" assigned to "S believes B is good" makes unintelligible "S believes B causally contributes to G."
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289195
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,798
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Darwin, Teleology and Taxonomy.Andrew Woodfield - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (183):35 - 49.
Functional Explanation in Biology.Hugh Lehman - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (1):1-20.
Resisting Buck-Passing Accounts of Prudential Value.Guy Fletcher - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):77-91.
Value and the Right Kind of Reason.Mark Schroeder - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5:25-55.
Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation.Marcel Quarfood - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):735-747.
Function Statements.Peter Achinstein - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (3):341-367.
Teleology and the Product Analogy.Mohan P. Matthen - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (1):21 – 37.
The Function of Function.M. Ratcliffe - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 31 (1):113-133.
Teleology.Andrew Woodfield - 1976 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
6 ( #574,978 of 2,202,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,061 of 2,202,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature