Image 2 (2321):231 (2012)
The purpose of this paper is to show that images have an ontological support by which they obtain an independent existence from the mind. In accordance with the new theories of aesthetics, we will see that the object of art is taken as an object of thought. Image has an important role in the existence of the work of art; therefore the image becomes an object of thought. To show how the image is independent from the mind or to show how it is not a mind-dependent object, the analysis has to start from the pre-ontological level of the work of art in order to understand the existence of images in correlation with the work of art. At the beginning there is only the object. The object is the work of art before its concretization. It is not nature; it is the natural support of art. From this point of view, the role of the image can be explored in all ontological stages of the work of art. Firstly, it can be argued that the intuition of the artist is the image of the idea underlying the work of art. The intentional image is a subjective image. Secondly, it seems that people can see or have in mind different images (representations) referring to a work of art. This is possible in time and space and implies cultural differences, historical events and so on. A question arises: what supports the intentional image? One answer put forward is that the mind is the support of the image, but it seems that the original intentional image has something that can make other intentional images possible, an infinite number of representations, in other words an infinite number of images. The aim of this paper is to show that we can talk about an original intentional image (the first idea), intentional images (the representations of the work of art in time and space), and the transcendental image which can be defined as the ontological condition for the existence of the intentional image. At the end I will argue that the transcendental image is the support or the entity which offers the ontological conditions necessary for all intentional images. Tags: intentional image, transcendental image, ontology, object and subjectivity.
|Keywords||The aim of this paper is to show that we can talk about an original intentional image (the first idea), intentional images (the representations of the work of art in time and space), and the transcendental image which can be defined as the ontological condition for the existence of the intentional image.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Writing the Image: An Adventure with Art and Theory.Yve Lomax - 1981 - I.B. Tauris.
Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence.Lambert Wiesing - 2011 - Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Vertiginous Mirrors: The Animation of the Visual Image and Early Modern Travel.San Juan & Rose Marie - 2011 - Distributed in the United States Exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan.
For Giving.Stephen David Ross - 2009 - International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
Infinite Exchange: The Social Ontology of the Photographic Image.Peter Osborne - 2010 - Philosophy of Photography 1 (1):59-68.
Sellarsian Synopsis: Integrating the Images.Jay L. Garfield - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Image and Ontology in Merleau-Ponty.Trevor Perri - 2013 - Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1):75-97.
The Romantic Image of the Intentional Structure.Forest Pyle - 2011 - In Jacques Khalip & Robert Mitchell (eds.), Releasing the Image: From Literature to New Media. Stanford University Press.
Image Content.Mohan Matthen - 2014 - In Berit Brogaard (ed.), Does Perception Have Content? Oxford University Press. pp. 265-290.
Added to index2012-05-28
Total downloads82 ( #60,480 of 2,143,470 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #70,831 of 2,143,470 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.