Carl Cohen's 'kind' arguments for animal rights and against human rights

Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43–59 (2004)
Abstract
Carl Cohen's arguments against animal rights are shown to be unsound. His strategy entails that animals have rights, that humans do not, the negations of those conclusions, and other false and inconsistent implications. His main premise seems to imply that one can fail all tests and assignments in a class and yet easily pass if one's peers are passing and that one can become a convicted criminal merely by setting foot in a prison. However, since his moral principles imply that nearly all exploitive uses of animals are wrong anyway, foes of animal rights are advised to seek philosophical consolations elsewhere. I note that some other philosopher's arguments are subject to similar objections.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00262.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Philosophers Changing Views.M. Fox & Animal Experimentation - 1987 - Between the Species 3 (2):55-80.
Do Animals Have Rights?Carl Cohen - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):91 – 102.
Carruthers and the Argument From Marginal Cases.Scott Wilson - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):135–147.
The Ethics of Animal Research: What Are the Prospects for Agreement?David Degrazia - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (1):23-34.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
From Human Rights to Sentient Rights.Alasdair Cochrane - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):655-675.
Industrial Farm Animal Production: A Comprehensive Moral Critique.John Rossi & Samual A. Garner - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (3):479-522.
Speciesism as a Moral Heuristic.Stijn Bruers - 2013 - Philosophia 41 (2):489-501.
Cohen and Kinds: A Response to Nathan Nobis.Neil Levy - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):213–217.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. [REVIEW]David Sztybel - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
The Rights of Humans and Other Animals.Tom Regan - 1997 - Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):103 – 111.
The Origin of Speciesism.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (275):41-.
Moral Rights and Animals.H. J. McCloskey - 1979 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 22 (1-4):23 – 54.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
103 ( #53,416 of 2,210,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #80,629 of 2,210,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature