Journal of Moral Education 28 (2):215-232 (1999)
Children's understanding of rules was investigated by observing 5-, 6- and 7-year-olds engaging in unrestricted joint activity with familiar peers. Initially, all groups collectively regulated themselves by negotiating the invention and alteration of rules, hence demonstrating understanding of the consensual origins, relativity and mutability of their own rules. However, children who later returned to participate in second episodes often imposed their previously invented rules, as if they were unalterable and non-negotiable, on their new partners. This suggested a traditionalist, or conservative, orientation to rules, reminiscent of Piaget's claim that children do not differentiate moral and conventional rules. An explanation of the apparent inconsistency in children sometimes sounding heteronomous and sometimes autonomous is proposed that emphasises the role of social context in the production of discourse about rules. These findings are discussed with reference to those of previous researchers, including the domain theorists, who have asked children only about elders' conventional rules, and hence risked confounding respect for rules with respect for the imposers of rules. Children can say very different things about a rule depending on when, how and by whom it was established and applied
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention.Elliot Turiel - 1983 - Cambridge University Press.
Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):601-602.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Order Relations Among Efficient Decision Rules.Jacob Paroush - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):209-218.
Philosophy for Children in Turkey.Nuran Direk - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 4:17-21.
Opposites Detract: Why Rules and Similarity Should Not Be Viewed as Opposite Ends of a Continuum.Gary Marcus - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
A Note on Harmony.Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (3):613-628.
Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas.Alex Shaw, Vivian Li & Kristina R. Olson - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (8):1383-1403.
“Commitment” Distinguishes Between Rules and Similarity: A Developmental Perspective.Gil Diesendruck - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):21-22.
The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Solidarity and Social Moral Rules.Adam Cureton - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (5):691-706.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads4 ( #645,333 of 2,172,053 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,053 )
How can I increase my downloads?