Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 44:233-277 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this paper, I investigate the foundations of Plotinus’ innovative theory that prime matter is unaffectable. I begin by showing that Plotinus’ main arguments for this thesis (in Ennead 3.6) all rely upon the controversial assumption that the properties prime matter underlies are not properties of prime matter itself. It is then argued that prime matter’s privation of sensible qualities has its conceptual basis in an idiosyncratic understanding of form-matter composition generally, and its primary doctrinal basis in Aristotle’s critical reports on the Platonists’ substratum in Physics 1.9. While Plotinus finds Platonic authority for unaffectible matter in the Receptacle passage of the Timaeus, it is Aristotle’s testimony that provides the crucial impetus for reading that text in this way. On this basis, Plotinus develops a Platonist conception of form’s inherence in matter with distinctively non-Aristotelian features.
|
Keywords | Plotinus matter hylomorphism change Timaeus |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Sensation and Scepticism in Plotinus.Sara Magrin - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39:249-297.
Chrysippus on Physical Elements.John M. Cooper - 2009 - In Ricardo Salles (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford University Press.
Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7).Jan Opsomer - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Aristotle’s Physics as an Authoritative Work in Early Neoplatonism.Riccardo Chiaradonna - 2021 - In Michael Erler, Jan Erik Heßler & Frederico Petrucci (eds.), Authority and Authoritative Texts in the Platonist Tradition. Cambridge University Press. pp. 163-177.
The Basic Logic of Plotinus' System: A Discussion of E. K. Emilsson, Plotinus. [REVIEW]Riccardo Chiaradonna - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 55:227-250.
La materia e i composti sensibili nella filosofia di Plotino.Riccardo Chiaradonna - 2016 - In Viano Cristina (ed.), Materia e causa materiale in Aristotele e oltre. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. pp. 149-170.
Plotinus, Ennead II.5: On What Is Potentially and What Actually. Translation with an Introduction and Commentary.Cinzia Arruzza - 2015 - Las Vegas; Zurich; Athens: Parmenides Publishing.
Plotinus’ Doctrine of Badness as Matter in Ennead I.8 [51].Eyjólfur K. Emilsson - 2019 - In Platonism and Christian Thought in Late Antiquity. London and New York: pp. 78 - 99.
View all 7 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7).Jan Opsomer - 2001 - Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness.Denis O’Brien - 2011 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):6-57.
Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part III: The Essential Background.Denis O’Brien - 2012 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (1):27-80.
How Plotinus' Soul Animates His Body: The Argument for the Soul-Trace at Ennead 4.4.18.1-9.Christopher Isaac Noble - 2013 - Phronesis 58 (3):249-279.
Between Matter and Body Mass () in the Sentences of Porphyry.Luc Brisson - 2010 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):36-53.
Plotinus on the Generation of Matter.John Phillips - 2009 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 3 (2):103-137.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-12-04
Total views
17 ( #636,416 of 2,507,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,901 )
2013-12-04
Total views
17 ( #636,416 of 2,507,901 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,901 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads