Philosophical Review 111 (1):105-108 (2002)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This long and ambitious work offers a systematic interpretation of Cartesian metaphysics and epistemology from the perspective of Descartes’s so-called founding principle, cogito ergo sum. The book is organized around the three parts of this famous dictum, though its scope is much more encompassing. Part 1 offers a careful analysis of the “formal structure” of Cartesian thought, in an effort to identify what is distinctive about the cogito and to uncover how Descartes’s theory of mind makes this insight possible. Part 2 addresses the notions of truth and certainty as they relate to the claim “I exist”. Part 3 tackles one of the most vexed interpretive questions relating to the cogito, namely, whether and in what sense “I exist” is inferred from “I think,” as the logical particle ergo would seem to suggest. The cogito principle, however, is only the lens through which Miles examines Descartes’s larger system. One attractive feature of the project is that he uses this principle to develop what he takes as a key to Descartes’s philosophy—the process of “analytical reflexion” by which knowledge that was previously only implicit is explicitly intuited. This interpretive key is then employed to unlock many of the other major Cartesian themes, including the method of doubt, clear and distinct perception, innate ideas, analytic and synthetic method, the infamous Circle, and the divine creation of the eternal truths. The result is a set of extremely scholarly readings of important texts and doctrines that, if not always convincing, is fresh, nuanced, and provocative.
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0031-8108 |
DOI | 10.1215/00318108-111-1-105 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy.A. H. Armstrong (ed.) - 1967 - London: Cambridge University Press.
The Cambridge History of later Greek and early Medieval Philosophy.[author unknown] - 1967 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 29 (2):407-409.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Insight and Inference: Descartes's Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy (Review).Tom Sorell - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):122-123.
Insight and Inference: Descartes’s Founding Principle and Modern Philosophy.Murray Lewis Miles - 1999 - University of Toronto Press.
Analytic Method, the Cogito, and Descartes’s Argument for the Innateness of the Idea of God.Murray Miles - 2010 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):289-320.
Cartesian Logic: An Essay on Descartes’s Conception of Inference.Stephen Gaukroger - 1989 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Descartes' Problematic Causal Principle of Ideas.Frederick J. O’Toole - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Research 18:167-191.
The Correspondence Between Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia and René Descartes.Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia & René Descartes - 2007 - University of Chicago Press.
Doubts About Descartes' Indubitability: The Cogito as Intuition and Inference.Peter Slezak - 2010 - Philosophical Forum 41 (4):389-412.
Learning From Six Philosophers: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume, 2 Volumes.Jonathan Bennett - 2001 - Oxford University Press (Hardcover).
The Unity of Descartes's Thought.Katalin Farkas - 2005 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (1):17 - 30.
A New Formulation of the Principle of Indifference.Rodolfo de Cristofaro - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):329-339.
A New Formulation of the Principle of Indifference.Rodolfo De Cristofaro - 2008 - Synthese 163 (3):329 - 339.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-12
Total views
87 ( #133,978 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,562 )
2010-09-12
Total views
87 ( #133,978 of 2,507,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads