The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):169–194 (1997)
Abstract
In the Fifth Meditation, Descartes makes a remarkable claim about the ontological status of geometrical figures. He asserts that an object such as a triangle has a 'true and immutable nature' that does not depend on the mind, yet has being even if there are no triangles existing in the world. This statement has led many commentators to assume that Descartes is a Platonist regarding essences and in the philosophy of mathematics. One problem with this seemingly natural reading is that it contradicts the conceptualist account of universals that one finds in the Principles of Philosophy and elsewhere. In this paper, I offer a novel interpretation of the notion of a true and immutable nature which reconciles the Fifth Meditation with the conceptualism of Descartes' other work. Specifically, I argue that Descartes takes natures to be innate ideas considered in terms of their so-called 'objective being'.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0114.00034
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Cartesian Causation: Body–Body Interaction, Motion, and Eternal Truths.Tad M. Schmaltz - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):737-762.
The Ontological Argument as an Exercise in Cartesian Therapy.Lawrence Nolan - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):521 - 562.
Essence and Possibility in the Leibniz‐Arnauld Correspondence.Eric Stencil - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):2-26.
Epistemology Past and Present.John Carriero - 2013 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (2pt2):175-200.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Descartes' Mind-Body Composites, Psychology and Naturalism.Lilli Alanen - 2008 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 51 (5):464 – 484.
True and Immutable Natures and Epistemic Progress in Descartes's Meditations.David Cunning - 2003 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):235 – 248.
On Failing to Be Cartesian: Reconsidering the ‘Impurity’ of Descartes’s Meditation.Robert C. Scharff - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):475 – 504.
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind.Antonia Lolordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Do Descartes and St. Thomas Agree on the Ontological Proof?John Edward Abbruzzese - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):413-435.
Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
The Importance of Cartesian Triangles: A New Look at Descartes's Ontological Argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Rethinking the Ontology of Cartesian Essences.Raffaella de Rosa - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):605 - 622.
A Dialogue with Descartes: Newton's Ontology of True and Immutable Natures.J. E. McGuire - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):103-125.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
82 ( #71,474 of 2,225,965 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #28,573 of 2,225,965 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature