A flawed argument for perdurance – reply to braddon-Mitchell and Miller

Analysis 65 (2):164–166 (2005)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00544.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Papers.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
The Loneliness of Stages.D. Braddon-Mitchell & K. Miller - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):235-242.
A Flawed Argument for Perdurance.Harold W. Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213–215.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
On the Conditional Analysis of Phenomenal Concepts.Torin Alter - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (2):235 - 253.
On the Conditional Analysis of Phenomenal Concepts.Torin Alter - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):777-778.
How Do We Know It is Now Now?David Braddon-Mitchell - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):199–203.
Pegs, Boards, and Relativistic Perdurance.Yuri Balashov - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):167-175.
A Flawed Argument for Perdurance.Harold W. Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213–215.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
71 ( #85,012 of 2,236,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #445,854 of 2,236,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature