Authors
Jeff Noonan
University of Windsor
Abstract
To the extent that classical, neoclassical, and Marxist political economy have traditionally ignored the problem of economic scale and valorized economic growth, all three have much to learn from ecological economics. Its most important contribution is the argument that the human economy is a subsystem of the finite earth’s natural life-support system. Implied in this argument is a new metric of economic health, the life-value rather than the money-value of that which economies produce and distribute.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Ecological Revolution of Economic Thoughts and Theories.Si-hua Liu - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (2):12-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-02

Total views
10 ( #877,273 of 2,454,496 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,496 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes