Against 'Realism'

Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We examine the prevalent use of the phrase “local realism” in the context of Bell’s Theorem and associated experiments, with a focus on the question: what exactly is the ‘realism’ in ‘local realism’ supposed to mean? Carefully surveying several possible meanings, we argue that all of them are flawed in one way or another as attempts to point out a second premise (in addition to locality) on which the Bell inequalities rest, and (hence) which might be rejected in the face of empirical data violating the inequalities. We thus suggest that the phrase ‘local realism’ should be banned from future discussions of these issues, and urge physicists to revisit the foundational questions behind Bell’s Theorem



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Interpretation of the quantum formalism and Bell's theorem.Emilio Santos - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (2):221-241.
Locality, Bell's theorem, and quantum mechanics.Peter Rastall - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (9):963-972.
Local Realism and Conditional Probability.Allen Stairs & Jeffrey Bub - 2006 - Foundations of Physics 36 (4):585-601.
Against 'Realism'.Michael Walzer - 1992 - In Jean Bethke Elshtain (ed.), Just war theory. New York: New York University Press. pp. 36--54.
Two arguments against realism.Author unknown - manuscript


Added to PP

122 (#152,041)

6 months
11 (#272,000)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Scientific Realism.Richard Boyd - 1984 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 21 (1&2):767-791.
Relational EPR.Matteo Smerlak & Carlo Rovelli - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):427-445.

View all 11 references / Add more references