- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366 (1996)
Abstract
Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, pp. 333-66. 1996.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- d-scholarship.pitt.edu
(no proxy) - d-scholarship.pitt.edu [2] (no proxy)
- d-scholarship.pitt.edu [3] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org [2] (no proxy)
- pitt.edu (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com (no proxy)
- tandfonline.com [2] (no proxy)
- cambridge.org (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Thought experiments. [REVIEW]James Robert Brown & Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):135-142.
Naturalizing, Normativity, and Using What “We” Know in Ethics.Margaret Urban Walker - 2000 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30 (sup1):75-101.
Time, Modernity, and Destructive Habits of Thought.Oliver Leaman - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (sup1):127-145.
The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. [REVIEW]T. M. Robinson - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):607-621.
In the Agora: The Public Face of Canadian Philosophy Andrew D. Irvine and John S. Russell, editors With a Foreword by John Ralston Saul Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006, xxvi + 486 pp., $75.00, $32.95 paper. [REVIEW]D. D. Todd - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (4):814-.
John Locke’s Liberalism. [REVIEW]Peter A. Schouls - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):117-130.
The Annus Mirabilis of 1986: Thought Experiments and Scientific Pluralism.Yiftach Fehige - 2021 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 11 (1):222-240.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
437 (#69,695)
6 months
33 (#115,268)
2009-01-28
Downloads
437 (#69,695)
6 months
33 (#115,268)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How Thought Experiments Increase Understanding.Michael T. Stuart - 2017 - In Michael T. Stuart, Yiftach Fehige & James Robert Brown, The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge. pp. 526-544.
Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):397-424.
References found in this work
Thought experiments since the scientific revolution.James Robert Brown - 1986 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1 (1):1 – 15.
Seeing the laws of nature [author's response to Norton, 1993].James Robert Brown - 1993 - Metascience 3:38-40.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-qtxsx uwo