Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):427-452 (2010)
There is considerable overlap between the interests of business ethicists and those of political philosophers. Questions about the moral justifiability of the capitalist system, the basis of property rights, and the problem of inequality in the distribution of income have been of central importance in both fields. However, political philosophers have developed, especially over the past four decades, a set of tools and concepts for addressing these questions that are in many ways quite distinctive. Most business ethicists, on the other hand, consider their field to be primarily a domain of applied ethics, and so adopt methods and conceptual frameworks developed by moral philosophers. In this paper, we discuss some of the salient differences between these two approaches, and suggest some ways in which business ethicists could benefit from taking a more “political philosophy” approach to these questions. Throughout, we underline the importance of seeking greater compatibility among the principles used in normative theorizing about markets, regulations, corporate governance, and business practices
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Business and Professional Ethics Social Science|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State.Sandrine Blanc & Ismael Al-Amoudi - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (4):497-525.
Professionalism, Agency, and Market Failures.Hasko von Kriegstein - 2016 - Business Ethics Quarterly 26 (4):445-464.
Global Labor Justice and the Limits of Economic Analysis.Joshua Preiss - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (1):55-83.
There Is No Rawlsian Theory of Corporate Governance.Abraham Singer - 2015 - Business Ethics Quarterly 25 (1):65-92.
Why Business Ethics Needs Rhetoric: An Aristotelian Perspective.Ronald F. Duska - 2014 - Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (1):119-134.
Similar books and articles
Two Views of Business Ethics: A Popular Philosophical Approach and a Value Based Interdisciplinary One. [REVIEW]Sherwin Klein - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):71 - 79.
The Limits and Prospects of Business Ethics.George G. Brenkert - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (4):703-709.
Positioning Business Ethics in Relation to Management and Political Philosophy.John Kaler - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):257 - 272.
Business and the Polis: What Does It Mean to See Corporations as Political Actors? [REVIEW]Pierre-Yves Néron - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3):333-352.
Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors?Eric Schwitzgebel & Joshua Rust - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2):189-199.
Post-Westphalia and Its Discontents.Michael A. Santoro - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):285-297.
Religion and Business Ethics: The Lessons From Political Morality. [REVIEW]Timothy L. Fort - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):263-273.
Ethics for International Business: Decision Making in a Global Political Economy.John M. Kline - 2010 - Routledge.
Business Ethics as Self-Regulation: Why Principles That Ground Regulations Should Be Used to Ground Beyond-Compliance Norms as Well. [REVIEW]Wayne Norman - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):43-57.
A Framework for Teaching Business Ethics.Alfonso R. Oddo - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):293-297.
Globalization and the Ethics of Business.R. Boatright John - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (1):1-6.
International Exchanges as the Basis for Conceptualizing Ethics in International Business.Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 31 (1):3 - 24.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads44 ( #118,665 of 2,171,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?