Analysis 50 (4):253 - 256 (1990)

Authors
Alastair Norcross
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
If consequentialism is understood as claiming, at least, that the moral character of an action depends only on the consequences of the action, it might be thought that the difficulty of knowing what all the consequences of any action will be poses a problem for consequentialism. J. J. C. Smart writes that in most cases..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/50.4.253
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Cluelessness.Hilary Greaves - 2016 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116 (3):311-339.
Consequentialism and Cluelessness.James Lenman - 2000 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (4):342-370.
Epistemic Humility, Arguments From Evil, and Moral Skepticism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 2:17-57.
Clues for Consequentialists.Joanna M. Burch-Brown - 2014 - Utilitas 26 (1):105-119.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
78 ( #117,433 of 2,325,398 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #298,641 of 2,325,398 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes