BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):2- (2008)

Authors
Yoshio Nukaga
Sophia University
Stuart Youngner
Case Western Reserve University
Abstract
BackgroundFew comparative studies of clinical ethics consultation practices have been reported. The objective of this study was to explore how American and Japanese experts analyze an Alzheimer's case regarding ethics consultation.MethodsWe presented the case to physicians and ethicists from the US and Japan (one expert from each field from both countries; total = 4) and obtained their responses through a questionnaire and in-depth interviews.ResultsEstablishing a consensus was a common goal among American and Japanese participants. In attempting to achieve consensus, the most significant similarity between Japanese and American ethics consultants was that they both appeared to adopt an "ethics facilitation" approach. Differences were found in recommendation and assessment between the American and Japanese participants. In selecting a surrogate, the American participants chose to contact the grandson before designating the daughter-in-law as the surrogate decision-maker. Conversely the Japanese experts assumed that the daughter-in-law was the surrogate.ConclusionOur findings suggest that consensus building through an "ethics facilitation" approach may be a commonality to the practice of ethics consultation in the US and Japan, while differences emerged in terms of recommendations, surrogate assessment, and assessing treatments. Further research is needed to appreciate differences not only among different nations including, but not limited to, countries in Europe, Asia and the Americas, but also within each country
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-9-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,348
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (2):155-158.
CQ Sources/Bibliography.Bette Anton - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):348-350.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Patient Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):1 - 9.
Clinical Research Consultation: A Casebook.Marion Danis (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside.John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer - 1991 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
56 ( #180,621 of 2,419,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #103,083 of 2,419,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes