- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Comparing incommensurable theories
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 17 (2):231-246 (1986)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Incommensurability.Harold I. Brown - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):3 – 29.
Comparing the incommensurable: Another look at convergent realism.Jay F. Rosenberg - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 54 (2):163 - 193.
Alternatives and incommensurables: The case of Darwin and Kelvin.J. N. Hattiangadi - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):502-507.
Incommensurability and theory comparison in experimental biology.Marcel Weber - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (2):155-169.
The comparability of scientific theories.Carl R. Kordig - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (4):467-485.
Intertheoretic relations and the future of psychology.Robert N. McCauley - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (June):179-99.
Are there rival, incommensurable theories?Dale W. Moberg - 1979 - Philosophy of Science 46 (2):244-262.
Incommensurability in cognitive guise.Muhammad Ali Khalidi - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (1):29 – 43.
The 'platforms' for comparing incommensurable taxonomies: A cognitive-historical analysis. [REVIEW]Xiang Chen - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (1):1-22.
On comparing and evaluating scientific theories.Adam Jonkisz & Leon Koj (eds.) - 2000 - Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
22 (#669,532)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
2010-09-02
Downloads
22 (#669,532)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method.Robert Nola & Howard Sankey (eds.) - 2000 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
The Evolutionary Analysis: Apparent Error, Certified Belief, and the Defects of Asymmetry.Alfred Nordmann - 1994 - Perspectives on Science 2 (2):131-175.
References found in this work
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Enterprise of Knowledge: An Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probability, and Chance.Isaac Levi - 1980 - MIT Press.
Theories, theorists and theoretical change.Philip Kitcher - 1978 - Philosophical Review 87 (4):519-547.
Meaning and scientific change.Dudley Shapere - 1966 - In R. Colodny (ed.), Mind and Cosmos: Essays in Contemporary Science and Philosophy. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 41--85.
Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of early nineteenth-century Edinburgh.Steven Shapin - 1975 - Annals of Science 32 (3):219-243.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo