Criteria of justice: Desert, needs and equality [Book Review]
Res Publica 7 (2):115-136 (2001)
The conception of social justice as equality is defended in this paper by examining what may appear to be two inegalitarian conceptions of justice, as distribution according to desert and as distribution according to need. It is argued that claims of just entitlement arise within a context of reciprocal co-operation for mutual benefit. Within such a context there are special cases where it can be said that those who contribute more deserve more, and that those who need more should get more, but those claims themselves presuppose a norm of equal contribution and equal benefit.
|Keywords||compensation contribution co-operation desert equality justice need reciprocity reward|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Desert and Distributive Justice in a Theory of Justice.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2002 - Journal of Social Philosophy 33 (1):131–143.
Liberty, Equality and Justice : A Critique of Kai Nielsen's Radical Egalitarianism.Chong-Fai Chan & 陳創輝 - unknown
Responsibility, Desert, and Justice.Carl Knight - 2011 - In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Brute Luck Equality and Desert.Peter Vallentyne - 2003 - In Sabrina Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and Justice. Clarendon Press.
Desert and Equality.Richard J. Arneson - 2007 - In Nils Holtug & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (eds.), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Clarendon Press. pp. 262--293.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #88,417 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,516 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?