Synthese 42 (1):71 - 90 (1979)

Abstract
In current philosophical debate Bell's theorem is often refered to as a proof of the impossibility of determinism in nature. It is argued here that this conclusion is wrong. The main consequence of the theorem is the non-local character of quantum theory itself and it is shown how this quality leads to a contradiction with the theory of relativity. If hidden variable theories are impossible, it is so because no empirically founded interpretation at all can be compatible with both quantum mechanics and relativity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00413705
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics.Simon Kochen & E. P. Specker - 1967 - Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17:59--87.
The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.E. Levy - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):161-175.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Nature of Quantum Mechanics.A. H. Klotz - 1988 - Synthese 77 (2):139 - 193.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
115 ( #78,331 of 2,330,814 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #395,593 of 2,330,814 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes