Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (1):111-134 (2006)

Ernesto Laclau's theory of antagonism and political identity has been widely celebrated as one of the most promising attempts to apply the lessons of ‘poststructuralism’ to political theory. This essay argues, however, that this initial promise is not fulfilled. Laclau's attempt to define and analyse ‘the political’ as such operates at such an abstract level that Laclau is forced to make sweeping claims about the nature of politics and identity that he simply cannot support; and his analysis of the decision that he claims defines politics is an unrealistic one that celebrates violence, and could have the wide appeal it has had only in a political culture that understood freedom as the absence of all constraint, rather than the achievement of autonomy. Key Words: antagonism • autonomy • decision • freedom • hegemony • identity • Laclau • ‘the political’ • rule-following • Wittgenstein.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0191453706059848
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony.Ernesto Laclau - 1996 - In Simon Critchley & Chantal Mouffe (eds.), Deconstruction and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 47--68.
Democracy and the Question of Power.Ernesto Laclau - 2001 - Constellations 8 (1):3-14.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Realistic Conception of Politics: Conflict, Order and Political Realism.Carlo Burelli - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #144,182 of 2,367,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #160,272 of 2,367,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes