Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall rehabilitated.

Centaurus 54 (2):148-164 (2012)
Abstract
Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall in his Two New Sciences is routinely dismissed as a moment of confused argumentation. We urge that Galileo's argument correctly identified why the speed-distance law is untenable, failing only in its very last step. Using an ingenious combination of scaling and self-similarity arguments, Galileo found correctly that bodies, falling from rest according to this law, fall all distances in equal times. What he failed to recognize in the last step is that this time is infinite, the result of an exponential dependence of distance on time. Instead, Galileo conflated it with the other motion that satisfies this ‘equal time’ property, instantaneous motion.
Keywords philosophy of physics  history of physics  Galileo
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Galileo Vs Aristotle on Free Falling Bodies.Markus Schrenk - 2004 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 7 (1):1-11.
Galileo and Prior Philosophy.David Atkinson - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):115-136.
Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo'sDiscorsi.Marta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17-24.
Patterns of Argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.
Galileo's Interventionist Notion of "Cause&Quot.Steffen Ducheyne - 2006 - Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (3):443-464.
Galileo, Rationality and Explanation.Joseph C. Pitt - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (1):87-103.
Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature.Douglas Michael Jesseph - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Galileo Heretic (Galileo Eretico).Michael Sharratt - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (4):685-.
Added to PP index
2012-10-12

Total downloads
48 ( #110,720 of 2,180,764 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,764 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums