Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 123-143 (2009)

Herbert Gleiter promoted the development of nanostructured materials on a variety of levels. In 1981 already, he formulated research visions and produced experimental as well as theoretical results. Still he is known only to a small community of materials scientists. That this is so is itself a telling feature of the imagined community of nanoscale research. After establishing the plausibility of the claim that Herbert Gleiter provided a major impetus, a second step will show just how deeply Gleiter shaped (and ceased to influence) the vision of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the US. Finally, then, the apparent invisibility of Gleiter's importance needs to be understood. This leads to the main question of this investigation. Though materials research meets even the more stringent definitions of nanotechnology, there remains a systematic tension between materials science and the device-centered visions of nanotechnology. Though it turned the tables on the scientific prestige of physics, materials science runs up against the engineering prestige of the machine.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2009.17.2.123
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,536
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Real Science: What It is, and What It Means.J. M. Ziman - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
67 ( #144,545 of 2,381,942 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #560,835 of 2,381,942 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes