Must evidence underdetermine theory

Abstract
According to the underdetermination thesis, all evidence necessarily underdetermines any scientific theory. Thus it is often argued that our agreement on the content of mature scientific theories must be due to social and other factors. Drawing on a long standing tradition of criticism, I shall argue that the underdetermination thesis is little more than speculation based on an impoverished account of induction. A more careful look at accounts of induction does not support an assured underdetermination or the holism usually associated with it. I also urge that the display of observationally equivalent theories is a self-defeating strategy for supporting the underdetermination thesis. The very fact that observational equivalence can be demonstrated by arguments brief enough to be included in a journal article means that we cannot preclude the possibility that the theories are merely variant formulations of the same theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,188
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
State of the Field: Transient Underdetermination and Values in Science.Justin Biddle - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):124-133.
Can We Know the Global Structure of Spacetime?John Byron Manchak - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (1):53-56.
Holism and Structuralism in (1) Gauge Theory.Holger Lyre - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):643-670.
Catching the WAVE: The Weight-Adjusting Account of Values and Evidence.Boaz Miller - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:69-80.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?P. Kyle Stanford - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S1-.
Underdetermination and the Explanation of Theory-Acceptance: A Response to Samir Okasha.Ward E. Jones - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):299 – 304.
Underdetermination and the Problem of Identical Rivals.P. D. Magnus - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1256-1264.
Epistemic Equivalence and Epistemic Incapacitation.D. Tulodziecki - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (2):313-328.
Are Quine’s Two Indeterminacy Theses Compatible? Forrai - 1999 - Acta Analytica 14 (23.):89-99..

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

106 ( #45,588 of 2,153,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

10 ( #67,931 of 2,153,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums