In Harold Kincaid (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 130-153 (2012)
AbstractComparing different causes’ importance, and apportioning responsibility between them, requires making good sense of the notion of partial explanation, that is, of degree of explanation. How much is this subjective, how much objective? If the causes in question are probabilistic, how much is the outcome due to them and how much to simple chance? I formulate the notion of degree of causation, or effect size, relating it to influential recent work in the literature on causation. I examine to what extent mainstream social science methods--both quantitative and qualitative--succeed in establishing effect sizes so understood. The answer turns out to be, roughly: only to some extent. Next, the standard understanding of effect size, even though widespread, still has several underappreciated consequences. I detail some of those. Finally, I discuss the separate issue of explanandum-dependence, which is essential to assessing any cause’s explanatory importance and yet which has been comparatively neglected.
Similar books and articles
Is Actual Difference Making Actually Different?Robert Northcott - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (11):629-633.
The scientific study of society, by Max Steuer. Kluwer academic publishers, 2003, XIII + 464 pages. [REVIEW]Anna Alexandrova & Robert Northcott - 2004 - Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):375-381.
Progress in economics: Lessons from the spectrum auctions.Anna Alexandrova & Robert Northcott - 2009 - In Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press. pp. 306--337.
Book Reviews : Passion for the Earth: The Christian Vocation to Promote Justice, Peace and the Integrity of Creation by Sean McDonagh, London, Geoffrey Chapman, 1994, viii + 164 pp. 9.95. Environmental Ethics edited by Robert Elliot, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995, vi + 255 pp. 11.95. [REVIEW]Michael Northcott - 1996 - Studies in Christian Ethics 9 (1):98-103.
A Response To Michael Northcott.Celia Deane-Drummond - 1994 - Studies in Christian Ethics 7 (1):46-51.
The "l'art pour l'art" Problem.Arnold Hauser & Kenneth Northcott - 1979 - Critical Inquiry 5 (3):425-440.
Book Review: A Political Theology of Nature. [REVIEW]Michael S. Northcott - 2004 - Studies in Christian Ethics 17 (3):76-80.
Being Silent: Time in the Spirit.Michael S. Northcott - 2004 - In Stanley Hauerwas & Samuel Wells (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Christian Ethics. Blackwell. pp. 414.
Economic Compulsion and Christian Ethics – By Albino Barrera.Michael Northcott - 2008 - Modern Theology 24 (2):324-326.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation.James Woodward - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
The Scientific Image.William Demopoulos & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (4):603.
Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation.Michael Strevens - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):233-249.