Rehabilitated

Abstract

Galileo's refutation of the speed-distance law of fall in his Two New Sciences is routinely dismissed as a moment of confused argumentation. We urge that Galileo's argument correctly identified why the speed-distance law is untenable, failing only in its very last step. Using an ingenious combination of scaling and self-similarity arguments, Galileo found correctly that bodies, falling from rest according to this law, fall all distances in equal times. What he failed to recognize in the last step is that this time is infinite, the result of an exponential dependence of distance on time. Instead, Galileo conflated it with the other motion that satisfies this ‘equal time’ property, instantaneous motion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Galileo vs Aristotle on free falling bodies.Markus Andreas Schrenk - 2004 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 7 (1):1-11.
Aspects of aristotelian statics in Galileo's dynamics.J. Groot - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Time.Brad Weslake - 2006 - In Martin Cohen (ed.), Essentials of Philosophy and Ethics. New York: Hodder Arnold.
Galileo, Hobbes, and the book of nature.Douglas Michael Jesseph - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Patterns of argumentation in Galileo's Discorsi.Marta Fehér - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17-24.
Patterns of argumentation in Galileo's discorsi.Marta Feh - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):17 – 24.
Galileo and the Philosophy of Science.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:130 - 139.
Irony and Galileo's Relativity Principle.William J. Gavin - 1971 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 46 (2):262-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-10-01

Downloads
30 (#548,002)

6 months
6 (#582,229)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John D. Norton
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism.John D. Norton - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):786-798.
Uniform Acceleration, Space, and Time.Stillman Drake - 1970 - British Journal for the History of Science 5 (1):21-43.
Galileo's 1604 Fragment on Falling Bodies.Stillman Drake - 1969 - British Journal for the History of Science 4 (4):340-358.

View all 7 references / Add more references