Journal of Value Inquiry 51 (2):341-356 (2017)

Kathryn J. Norlock
Trent University
Open Access: Appreciating the relationship of the living to our dead is an aspect of human life that seems to be neglected in philosophy. I argue that living individuals can have ongoing, non-imaginary, valuable relationships with deceased loved ones. This is important to establish because arguments for such relationships better generate claims in applied ethics about our conduct with respect to our dead. In the first half of the paper I advance the narrower claim that psychological literature affirmative of “imaginal relationships” with the dead is relevant to philosophical literature on metaphysical arguments for the dead as relata. The relevance of those psychological insights to philosophers’ metaphysical insights matters for understanding the value of relationships with deceased loved ones. In the second half of the paper I advance the wider claim that the importance of one’s most dearly held relationships with living individuals is best explained in terms of imaginal content, as well; in other words, some interpersonal relationships between the living are personally important because of their imaginal content. Once we appreciate this, it is clearer why recognizably real, imaginally informed relationships with the living are not necessarily cut off on the day someone dies, and permit the possibilities for ethical activities including forgiving the dead, honoring the dead, and carrying out their wishes after they are gone.
Keywords imaginal  relationships  death
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10790-016-9573-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,777
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Online Shaming.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2017 - Social Philosophy Today 33:187-197.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Real Life.Gary Mar - manuscript
Independence of Phonetic and Imaginal Features.Douglas L. Nelson & David H. Brooks - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):1.
The Disjunctive Imaginal World in Our Philosophy.Mansour Imanpour - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 42.
An Overview of the Imaginal World.Dr Davari - unknown - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 28.
La politica immaginale [The imaginal politics].Chiara Bottici - 2009 - la Società Degli Individui 36:131-142.
Reasoning About Dead Agents: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.Harvey Whitehouse - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):485-486.


Added to PP index

Total views
63 ( #161,889 of 2,425,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #76,890 of 2,425,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes