Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1933-1934 (2011)

In Norman, Price, and Jones , we argued that the ability to apply two sets of grammar rules flexibly from trial to trial on a “mixed-block” AGL classification task indicated strategic control over knowledge that was less than fully explicit. Jiménez suggested that our results do not in themselves prove that participants learned – and strategically controlled – complex properties of the structures of the grammars, but that they may be accounted for by learning of simple letter frequencies. We first explain why our main conclusions regarding strategic control and conscious awareness are a separable issue to this criticism. We then report additional data which show that our participants’ ability to discriminate between the two grammars was not attributable to differences in simple letter frequencies
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.011
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Centrality of Wonder in Paul's Soteriology.D. Mark Davis - 2006 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 60 (4):404-418.
Why Frequencies Are Natural.Brian Butterworth - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):259-260.
Learning to Cooperate: Reciprocity and Self-Control.Peter Danielson - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):256-257.


Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #210,887 of 2,454,729 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,745 of 2,454,729 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes