Informal Logic 14 (2) (1992)

In order to tesl for critical thinking dispositions, the presence of the requisite critical thinking abilities must first be established. Otherwise, it is always a plausible counterexplanation of failure to use certain abilities that they were not possessed. If a person spontaneously uses some ability on a task, then it is often legitimate to conclude that the person has both the ability and the disposition to use it. However, if the person does not use the ability spontaneously, the conclusion is ambiguous. The person might not have the ability, or might have the ability but not the disposition to use it, or not the disposition to use it in the specific circumstances of the presented task. This paper proposes methods of critical thinking testing designed to deal with each of these possibilities
Keywords critical thinking testing, critical thinking dispositions, test validity, dispositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Principles of Scientific Thinking.R. Harré - 1972 - Synthese 25 (1):248-253.
Testing Fairmindedness.Alec Fisher - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (1).
The Principles of Scientific Thinking.[author unknown] - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (1):69-78.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Advancing the Rationality Debate.Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):701-717.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #217,314 of 2,448,310 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,685 of 2,448,310 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes