Authors
Bryan Norton
University of Cologne
Abstract
The revelatory paper, “Dilemmas in the General Theory of Planning,” by Rittel and Webber (Policy Sci 4:155–169, 1973 ) has had great impact because it provides one example of an emergent consensus across many disciplines. Many “problems,” as addressed in real-world situations, involve elements that exceed the complexity of any known or hoped-for model, or are “wicked.” Many who encounter this work for the first time find that their concept of wicked problems aptly describes many environmental disputes. For those frustrated with the lack of progress in many areas of environmental protection, Rittel and Webber’s work suggested a powerful explanatory hypothesis: Complex environmental problems cannot be comprehended within any of the accepted disciplinary models available in the academy or in discourses on public interest and policy. What should we conclude about the future of social improvements, and about the possibilities for rational discourse leading to cooperative action, with respect to this huge number of pressing public, environmental problems? Can we find ways to address environmental problems that improves the ability of communities to respond creatively and rationally to them? I will argue that, while the Rittel-Webber critique requires us to abandon many of the assumptions associated with a positivistic view of science and its applications to policy analysis, it also points to a more productive direction for the future of policy analysis. I will introduce “boundary critique,” developed within Critical Systems Theory (CST), an approach that offers some reason for optimism in dealing with some aspects of wickedness
Keywords Complexity  Wicked problems  Decision heuristics  Systems theory  Optimization  Boundary critique
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-011-9333-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,046
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Social Choice and Individual Values.Irving M. Copi - 1952 - Science and Society 16 (2):181-181.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Observing Environments.Hugo F. Alrøe & E. Noe - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):39-52.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Reply to My Critics.Bryan G. Norton - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (4):387-405.
Pragmatic Paths to Environmental Sustainability.Larry A. Hickman - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (4):365-373.
Why Norton's Approach is Insufficient for Environmental Ethics.Laura Westra - 2009 - In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Environmental Ethics. Temple University Press. pp. 279-297.
Wickedness Redux.Peter Brian Barry - 2011 - Philo 14 (2):137-160.
Nature Versus the State? Markets, States, and Environmental Protection.Albert Weale - 1992 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 6 (2-3):153-170.
Pragmatism in Environmental Ethics.Robert E. Manning - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):191-207.
What Happens to Environmental Philosophy in a Wicked World?Paul B. Thompson & Kyle Powys Whyte - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (4):485-498.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-08-12

Total views
33 ( #331,252 of 2,454,450 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,450 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes