Why I am not a nonanthropocentrist: Callicott and the failure of monistic inherentism

Environmental Ethics 17 (4):341-358 (1995)
I contrast two roles for environmental philosophers—“applied philosophy” and “practical philosophy”—and show that the strategy of applied philosophy encourages an axiological and monistic approach to theory building. I argue that the mission of applied philosophy, and the monistic theory defended by J. Baird Callicott, in particular, tends to separate philosophers and their problems from real management issues because applied philosophers and moral monists insist that theoretical exploration occurs independent of, and prior to, applications in particular situations. This separation of theory and practice suggests that philosophers are likely to be effective in policy discussions only to the degree that they can offer unquestioned theories that adjudicate real problems. Callicott offers his monistic, ontological approach as universal guidance to environmental activists and decision makers, arguing that ecosystems and communities are moral subjects that can “own” their own inherent value. Callicott’s theory, however, faces a crucial, unanswered theoretical dilemma which illustrates the impossibility of the dual task Callicott has set for his theory—to provide a single, ontological unification of ethics under nonanthropocentric holism and to capture the fine nuances of ethical obligations as experienced in varied communities. I also show that monistic assumptions have led to an unfortunate interpretation ofAldo Leopold’s land ethic and that a pluralist and pragmatist direction is likely to provide a more efficacious and theoretically defensible direction for further study of environmental philosophy in a more practical mode.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics19951743
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,359
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):123 – 147.
Beyond Anthropocentrism.Robin Attfield - 2011 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 69:29-46.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Indigenous Worlds and Callicott's Land Ethic.Annie Booth - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (3):273-290.
The Land Ethic and Callicott's Ethical System (1980-2001): An Overview and Critique.Y. S. Lo - 2001 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):331 – 358.
Pragmatism in Practice.Peter S. Wenz - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):391-410.
Callicott's “Metaphysics of Morals”.Jim Cheney - 1991 - Environmental Ethics 13 (4):311-325.
On Norton and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism.J. Baird Callicott - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):219-221.
Ecological Morality and Nonmoral Sentiments.Ernest Partridge - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):149-163.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #180,130 of 2,225,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #114,656 of 2,225,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature