Environmental Ethics 17 (4):341-358 (1995)
I contrast two roles for environmental philosophers—“applied philosophy” and “practical philosophy”—and show that the strategy of applied philosophy encourages an axiological and monistic approach to theory building. I argue that the mission of applied philosophy, and the monistic theory defended by J. Baird Callicott, in particular, tends to separate philosophers and their problems from real management issues because applied philosophers and moral monists insist that theoretical exploration occurs independent of, and prior to, applications in particular situations. This separation of theory and practice suggests that philosophers are likely to be effective in policy discussions only to the degree that they can offer unquestioned theories that adjudicate real problems. Callicott offers his monistic, ontological approach as universal guidance to environmental activists and decision makers, arguing that ecosystems and communities are moral subjects that can “own” their own inherent value. Callicott’s theory, however, faces a crucial, unanswered theoretical dilemma which illustrates the impossibility of the dual task Callicott has set for his theory—to provide a single, ontological unification of ethics under nonanthropocentric holism and to capture the fine nuances of ethical obligations as experienced in varied communities. I also show that monistic assumptions have led to an unfortunate interpretation ofAldo Leopold’s land ethic and that a pluralist and pragmatist direction is likely to provide a more efficacious and theoretically defensible direction for further study of environmental philosophy in a more practical mode.
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists.Ben A. Minteer & James P. Collins - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4):483-501.
Convergence in Environmental Values: An Empirical and Conceptual Defense.Ben A. Minteer & Robert E. Manning - 2000 - Ethics, Place and Environment 3 (1):47 – 60.
To Act or Not to Act? Sheltering Animals From the Wild: A Pluralistic Account of a Conflict Between Animal and Environmental Ethics.Bernice Bovenkerk, Frans Stafleu, Ronno Tramper, Jan Vorstenbosch & Frans W. A. Brom - 2003 - Ethics, Place and Environment 6 (1):13 – 26.
Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View.Y. S. Lo - 2006 - Inquiry 49 (2):123 – 147.
Similar books and articles
The Inadequacy of Callicott's Ecological Communitarianism.Darren Domsky - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (4):395-412.
Indigenous Worlds and Callicott's Land Ethic.Annie Booth - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (3):273-290.
The Land Ethic and Callicott's Ethical System (1980-2001): An Overview and Critique.Y. S. Lo - 2001 - Inquiry 44 (3):331 – 358.
Pragmatism in Practice: The Efficiency of Sustainable Agriculture.Peter S. Wenz - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):391-410.
Callicott and the Metaphysical Basis of Ecocentric Morality.James Fieser - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (2):171-180.
On Norton and the Failure of Monistic Inherentism.J. Baird Callicott - 1996 - Environmental Ethics 18 (2):219-221.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #206,040 of 2,152,250 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #226,015 of 2,152,250 )
How can I increase my downloads?