Richard Paul’s Approach to Critical Thinking


Abstract
Richard Paul changed the face and the practice of critical thinking for hundreds of thousands of educators, professionals, and reflective persons across the world. In this paper I describe Paul’s goals and, briefly, some of his achievements in articulating his robust approach to critical thinking. I focus primarily on its direct orientation to practicality; its comprehensiveness, its applicability in any domain; and its systematicity, its coherent, interlocking way of laying out all the significant dimensions of critical thinking consistent with use in practice. I also describe some implications of Paul’s work: its relation to other models or approaches that are more limited in their comprehensiveness, systematicity, and/or practicality; the contrast between Paul’s maximally flexible account and accounts or teaching practices based on specific directives; and the capacity Paul’s articulation carries with it of being able to enhance any approach to thinking things through.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Teaching Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1093-1082
DOI 10.5840/inquiryct20163114
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Richard Paul and the Philosophical Foundations of Critical Thinking.Donald Hatcher - 2016 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 31 (1):86-97.
Portaging Richard Paul’s Model to Professional Practice.Robert Niewoehner - 2016 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 31 (1):69-85.
From Argument and Philosophy to Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum.Gerald Nosich - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (3):4-13.
Truth-Seeking Versus Confirmation Bias.Amanda Hiner - 2016 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 31 (1):52-68.
Eating Flowers, Holding Hands: Should Critical Thinking Pedagogy ‘Go Wild’?Ben Hamby - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (3):47-53.
Critical Thinking and the State of Education Today.Richard Paul - 1996 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 16 (2):12-34.
Critical Thinking in the Literature Classroom, Part I: Making Critical Thinking Visible.Amanda Hiner - 2013 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 28 (1):26-35.
Critical Thinking.Robert Ennis - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):5-19.
Critical Thinking and Emotional Well-Being.Claude Gratton - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (3):39-51.
Making a Campus-Wide Commitment to Critical Thinking.Patricia Payette & Edna Ross - 2016 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 31 (1):98-110.
Back to Knowledge: The Ironic Path of Teaching Thinking.Yoram Harpaz - 2011 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (3):39-46.
Conflicting Logics in Teaching Critical Thinking.Yoram Harpaz - 2010 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 25 (2):5-17.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-05-15

Total views
30 ( #306,298 of 2,285,691 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #417,490 of 2,285,691 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature