Clinical ethics case consultation in a university department of cardiology and intensive care: a descriptive evaluation of consultation protocols
Michel Noutsias, Daniel Sedding, Jochen Dutzmann, Henning Rosenau, Kim P. Linoh, Nicolas Heirich, Stephan Nadolny, Jan Schildmann & Andre Nowak
BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-12 (2021)
AbstractBackgroundClinical ethics case consultations provide a structured approach in situations of ethical uncertainty or conflicts. There have been increasing calls in recent years to assess the quality of CECCs by means of empirical research. This study provides detailed data of a descriptive quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a CECC service in a department of cardiology and intensive care at a German university hospital.MethodsSemi-structured document analysis of CECCs was conducted in the period of November 1, 2018, to May 31, 2020. All documents were analysed by two researchers independently.ResultsTwenty-four CECCs were requested within the study period, of which most had been initiated by physicians of the department. The patients were an average of 79 years old, and 14 patients were female. The median length of stay prior to request was 12.5 days. The most frequent diagnoses were cardiology-related, followed by sepsis and cancer. Twenty patients lacked decisional capacity. The main reason for a CECC request was uncertainty about the balancing of potential benefit and harm related to the medically indicated treatment. Further reasons included differing views regarding the best individual treatment option between health professionals and patients or between different team members. Consensus between participants could be reached in 18 consultations. The implementation of a disease specific treatment intervention was recommended in five cases. Palliative care and limitation of further disease specific interventions was recommended in 12 cases.ConclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first in-depth evaluation of a CECC service set up for an academic department of cardiology and intensive medical care. Patient characteristics and the issues deliberated during CECC provide a starting point for the development and testing of more tailored clinical ethics support services and research on CECC outcomes.
Similar books and articles
Ethik-Konsultationsdienst nach dem Konzept von J.C. Fletcher an der University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA : Ein Praxisbericht aus dem Klinikum der Philipps-Universität Marburg.Burkhard Gerdes & Gerd Richter - 1999 - Ethik in der Medizin 11 (4):249-261.
Training in clinical ethics consultation: the Washington Hospital Center course.Jeffrey P. Spike - 2012 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (2):147.
Ethics Consultation and Empathy: Finding the Balance in Clinical Settings.Florian Bruns & Andreas Frewer - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (4):247-255.
The practice of balancing in clinical ethics case consultation.Rosalind McDougall, Cade Shadbolt & Lynn Gillam - 2020 - Clinical Ethics 15 (1):49-55.
Research on clinical ethics and consultation. Introduction to the theme.Stella Reiter-Theil & George J. Agich - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):3-5.
Quality Standards for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Alfred Simon - 2009 - Diametros 22:105 – 115.
The Care Dialog: the “ethics of care” approach and its importance for clinical ethics consultation.Patrick Schuchter & Andreas Heller - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (1):51-62.
Why Quality Is Addressed So Rarely in Clinical Ethics Consultation.George J. Agich - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):339.
Master in “Clinical Bioethics Consultation”: an Italian training program for Clinical Ethics Consultants.Federico Nicoli, Renzo Pegoraro, Antonio G. Spagnolo & Mario Picozzi - 2016 - International Journal of Ethics Education 2 (1):49-56.
Paradigms for Clinical Ethics Consultation Practice.Mark D. Fox, Glenn Mcgee & Arthur Caplan - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):308-314.
Review of Clinical Ethics Consultation - A Practical Guide. [REVIEW]Julia Gill - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 2 (2):17-18.
Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation: A European Perspective.Margarete Pfäfflin, Klaus Kobert & Stella Reiter-Theil - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (4):406.
The use of consultation in psychological practice: Ethical, legal, and clinical considerations.Sally Clayton & Bruce Bongar - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (1):43 – 57.
Max Weber on ethics case consultation: a methodological critique of the conference on evaluation of ethics consultation.F. D. Degnin - 1997 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 8 (2):181.
A descriptive study of healthcare ethics consultants in canada: Results of a national survey. [REVIEW]Michael D. Coughlin & John Watts - 1993 - HEC Forum 5 (3):144-164.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Marking Its Fortieth Anniversary.James Childress & Tom Beauchamp - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):9-12.
Ethics consultation in united states hospitals: A national survey.Ellen Fox, Sarah Myers & Robert A. Pearlman - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):13 – 25.
Moral distress experienced by nurses: A quantitative literature review.Younjae Oh & Chris Gastmans - 2015 - Nursing Ethics 22 (1):15-31.
Moral distress: A review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature. [REVIEW]J. McCarthy & C. Gastmans - 2015 - Nursing Ethics 22 (1):131-152.
Impact of moral case deliberation in healthcare settings: a literature review.Maaike M. Haan, Jelle L. P. van Gurp, Simone M. Naber & A. Stef Groenewoud - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):85.