Vivarium 44 (s 2-3):338-374 (2006)

In what follows, I analyze Ralph Strode's treatise on obligations. I have used a hitherto unpublished edition of the text (based on 14 manuscripts) made by Prof. E.J. Ashworth. I first give a brief description of Strode's text, which is all the more necessary given that it is not available to the average reader; I also offer a reconstruction of the rules proposed by Strode, following the style of reconstruction used in my analysis of Burley's and Swyneshed's rules elsewhere—that is, essentially based on the idea that obligationes can be viewed as logical games. In the second part, I address Strode's explicit arguments contra Swyneshed. In the third part, I discuss Strode's epistemic and pragmatic approach to obligationes.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/156853406779159400
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Four Phases of Medieval Epistemic Logic.Ivan Boh - 2000 - Theoria 66 (2):129-144.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
69 ( #132,891 of 2,326,144 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #213,215 of 2,326,144 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes