Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (4):355-368 (2006)

In his paper “St. Anselm’s ontological argument succumbs to Russell’s paradox” Christopher Viger presents a critique of Anselm’s Argument from the second chapter of Proslogion. Viger claims there that he manages to show that the greater than relation that Anselm used in his proof leads to inconsistency. I argue firstly, that Viger does not show what he maintains to show, secondly, that the flaw is not in the nature of Anselm’s reasoning but in Viger’s (mis)understanding of Anselm as well as in Viger’s (mis)application of some set-theoretical notions. I also describe some features of Anselmian greater than relation, which indeed plays a crucial role in his Ontological Argument. Last but not least, I present the Argument itself
Keywords ontology  St. Anselm, Russell’s paradox  ontological argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
DOI 10.12775/LLP.2006.020
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
St. Anselm's Ontological Argument Succumbs to Russell's Paradox.Christopher Viger - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):123-128.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ontological Argument and Russell's Antinomy.Sara L. Uckelman - 2009 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 18 (3-4):309-312.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #672,164 of 2,446,562 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #231,676 of 2,446,562 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes