Zygon 47 (4):970-996 (2012)
Traditional eschatology clashes with the theory of entropy. Trying to bridge the gap, Robert John Russell assumes that theology and science are based on contradictory, yet equally valid, metaphysical assumptions, each one capable of questioning and impacting the other. The author doubts that Russell's proposal will convince empirically oriented scientists and attempts to provide a viable alternative. Historical‐critical analysis suggests that biblical future expectations were redemptive responses to changing human needs. Apocalyptic visions were occasioned by heavy suffering in postexilic times. Interpreted in realistic terms, they have since proved to be untenable. The expectation of a new creation without evil, suffering, and death is not constitutive for the substantive content of the biblical message as such. Biblical future expectations must be reconceptualized in terms of best contemporary insight and in line with a dynamic reading of the biblical witness as God's vision of comprehensive optimal well‐being that operates like a shifting horizon and opens up ever new vistas, challenges, and opportunities
|Keywords||historical‐critical method entropy empiricism apocalyptic Robert J. Russell eschatology biblical interpretation biblical future expectations resurrection for judgment resurrection of Christ|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
At Home in the Universe the Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity.Stuart A. Kauffman - 1995
Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action.R. J. Russell, N. Murphy & C. J. Isham (eds.) - 1993 - Vatican Observatory.
Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress.Robert John Russell, Nancey Murphy & William R. Stoeger (eds.) - 2009 - Vatican Observatory Fnd Ndup.
The Living Dead and the Living God: Christ and the Ancestors in a Changing Africa.K. Nürnberger - 2008 - Hts Theological Studies 64 (2):1103-1105.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Eschatology and Scientific Cosmology: From Deadlock to Interaction.Robert John Russell - 2012 - Zygon 47 (4):997-1014.
Five Attitudes Toward Nature and Technology From a Christian Perspective1.Robert John Russell - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (2):149-159.
History and Eschatology in John Scottus Eriugena and His Time: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference of the Society for the Promotion of Eriugenian Studies, [Held at] Maynooth and Dublin, August 16-20, 2002. [REVIEW]Michael Dunne & J. J. McEvoy (eds.) - 2002 - University Press.
Robert J. Russell's Eschatological Theology in the Context of Cosmology.Willem B. Drees - 2010 - Zygon 45 (1):228-236.
Entropy-A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press.
Entropy : A Concept That is Not a Physical Quantity.Shufeng Zhang - 2012 - Physics Essays 25 (2):172-176.
The Significance of Eschatology in the Thoughts of Nicolas Berdyaev.Carnegie Samuel Calian - 1965 - Leiden: Brill.
A Relativistic Eschatology: Time, Eternity, and Eschatology in Light of the Physics of Relativity.Antje Jackelén - 2006 - Zygon 41 (4):955-974.
The Church: Midwife of History or Witness of the Eschaton?Reinhard L. Hütter - 1990 - Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (1):27 - 54.
Is Physics Fundamental? Robert Russell on Divine Action.John F. Haught - 2010 - Zygon 45 (1):213-220.
Parametric Scaling From Species Relative Abundances to Absolute Abundances in the Computation of Biological Diversity: A First Proposal Using Shannon's Entropy.Carlo Ricotta - 2003 - Acta Biotheoretica 51 (3):181-188.
Added to index2012-11-21
Total downloads26 ( #188,425 of 2,146,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #43,392 of 2,146,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.