Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):177-182 (2002)

Objectives: Hospital ethics committees increasingly affect medical care worldwide, yet there has been little evaluation of these bodies. Israel has the distinction of having ethics committees legally required by a Patients' Rights Act. We studied the development of ethics committees in this legal environment.Design: Cross-sectional national survey of general hospitals to identify all ethics committees and interview of ethics committee chairpersons.Setting: Israel five years after the passage of the Patients' Rights Act.Main measurements: Patients' rights and informal ethics committee structure and function.Results: One-third of general hospitals have an ethics committee, with committees concentrated in larger facilities. Hospitals without committees tended to lack any structure to handle ethics issues. Committees tend to be interdisciplinary and gender-mixed but ethnic mix was poor. Confidentiality is the rule, however, legal liability is a concern. One-third of patients' rights ethics committees never convened and most committees had considered fewer than ten consults. Access to the consultation process and the consultation process itself varied substantially across committees. Some patients' rights ethics committees attempted to solve cases, others only rendered decisions. Informal committees often refused to consider cases within Patients' Rights Act jurisdiction.Conclusions: Despite statutory requirement, many Israeli patients and clinicians do not have access to ethics committees. The scant volume of cases shows serious discrepancies between practice and Patients' Rights Act regulations, suggesting the need for education or revision of the law. Heterogeneity in committee function demonstrates need for substantial improvement
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.28.3.177
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,088
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Don't Physicians Use Ethics Consultation?L. Davies & Leonard D. Hudson - 1999 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 10 (2):116.
Practicing Ethics: Where's the Action?Leon R. Kass - 1990 - Hastings Center Report 20 (1):5-12.
Ethics Committees in Israel: For Better or Worse.Michael L. Gross - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (1):49-50.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Role of Ethics Committees in Public Debate.Lonneke M. Poort - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):19-35.
Ethics Committees for "High Tech" Innovations in Japan.Rihito Kimura - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):457-464.
Two Models of Ethics Committees.Simon Clarke - 2005 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (1):41-47.


Added to PP index

Total views
22 ( #479,374 of 59,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #515,500 of 59,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes